STAT CENTRAL ...Click here to return to the tournament page

2012 WIAA Boys 1A Championship
Tournament Summary
(Updated every Half-Hour)

Tournament Standings Click on heading to sort

Team Won Lost Pct. Points
Scored 		Points
Allowed 		Diff. Off.
Reb% 		Def.
Reb% 		Total
Reb%
Lynden Christian 3 0 100% 144(48) 129(43) 15(5) 33.7% 74.1% 70.9%
Toledo 2 1 70% 161(53.7) 114(38) 47(15.7) 44% 60.3% 65.4%
Zillah 2 1 70% 152(50.7) 137(45.7) 15(5) 45.1% 60.2% 52.3%
Cascade Christian 2 1 70% 138(46) 121(40.3) 17(5.7) 20% 67.5% 83.5%
Cashmere 1 2 30% 144(48) 151(50.3) -7(-2.3) 34.5% 71% 64%
Naches Valley 1 2 30% 124(41.3) 160(53.3) -36(-12) 32.3% 62.6% 64.8%
Granger 0 2 0% 92(46) 100(50) -8(-4) 30.5% 62.5% 58.3%
Kalama 0 2 0% 78(39) 121(60.5) -43(-21.5) 28.2% 66.1% 65.1%

Team Highs
Most Pts: 66 Zillah (vs. Cashmere)
Most FGM: 18 Granger (vs. Naches Valley)
Most Fga: 55 Granger (vs. Naches Valley)
Most 3pm: 10 Toledo (vs. Kalama)
Most 3pa: 25 Cashmere (vs. Zillah)
Most Ftm: 20 Lynden Christian (vs. Zillah)
Most Fta: 30 Cascade Christian (vs. Naches Valley)
Best FG%: 59.3 Naches Valley (vs. Granger)
Best 3pt%: 62.5 Toledo (vs. Kalama)
Best Ft%: 95.2 Lynden Christian (vs. Zillah)
Most Reb: 44 Lynden Christian (vs. Granger)
Most Orb: 20 Granger (vs. Naches Valley)
Most Drb: 32 Multiple Teams
Most Ast: 11 Toledo (vs. Naches Valley)
Most Stl: 13 Granger (vs. Lynden Christian)
Most Blk: 9 Naches Valley (vs. Toledo)

© 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 CyberSports for Basketball, CyberSports for Football, CyberSports for Volleyball, CyberSports for Baseball/Softball, and CyberSportsUSA owned and operated by CyberSports, Inc. All Rights Reserved. CyberSportsUSA Designed and Developed by PromoLab